Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Monday, 21 May 2018

The Big Data Treasure Hunt is Underway

+

"There is a treasure hunt underway, driven by the insights to be extracted from data and the dormant value that can be unleashed by a shift from causation to correlation. But it’s not just one treasure. Every single dataset is likely to have some intrinsic, hidden, not yet unearthed value, and the race is on to discover and capture all of it."

                     From page 15 in ‘Big Data: A revolution that transform how we live, work and think.’

+

Saturday, 19 May 2018

Big Data: The Latest God Killer

+

+

Thursday, 17 May 2018

On the Sea Squirt Analogy: First it makes you laugh...

+
I won't eat my own brain because I lost my "Rock of Gibraltar"

Having stumbled across the power of the IDD big data research method, which demolished establishment beliefs in the originality of my former heroes Richard Dawkins, Stanley Cohen, Jock Young, and Robert Merton, I set about using it to at least establish the veracity of my rock of Gibraltar knowledge that Darwin and Wallace did at least independently, yet dually, originated the prior-published theory of evolution by natural selection. But the new data I unearthed stopped me from eating my own brain like a sea squirt happily attached to its rock does.

Astoundingly, I originally unearthed the fact that Darwin’s and Wallace’s influencers, and their influencer's influencers, cited the book containing Patrick Matthew's prior-published breakthrough of the entire theory before they replicated it in 1858 (Darwin also in 1859) and replicated so many of Matthew's (1831) highly idiosyncratic explanatory examples. Darwin even originally four-word-shuffled Matthew's essential original term: 'natural process of selection' to 'process of natural selection' - the words process, selection and natural being absolutely essential to name the theory. Then, when challenged by Matthew in 1860, Darwin told proven lies to deny any naturalists had read Matthew's ideas before he replicated them without citing Matthew.

If you do not wish to eat YOUR own brain folks, then the business of clinging to your own "rock of Gibraltar" - rather than thinking about new facts that smash it to sand - psychology does indeed teach us a lot about what the sea squirt can teach us. For more info on this analogy, just Google "on knowledge contamination". And a paper on the IDD method has just been co published by myself and the leading psychologist Prof. Mark Griffiths see Sutton, M. and Griffiths, M. D. 2018. Using Date Specific Searches on Google Books to Disconfirm Prior Origination Knowledge Claims for Particular Terms, Words, and Names. Journal of Soc. Sci.
+

+


Page 5:

"The data can reveal secrets to those with the humility, the willingness and the tools to listen."

Page 7:

"Most strikingly, society will have to shed some of its obsession for causality in exchange for simple correlations: not knowing why but only what. This overturns centuries of established practices and challenges our most basic understanding of how to make decisions and comprehend reality."





+ +

Friday, 11 May 2018

Fun Stuff on Barking Mad Dogma Rage

Wednesday, 9 May 2018

Darwin the liar and Darwin dogma rage

Friday, 4 May 2018

Alfred Wallace the species killer

Alfred Wallace
The likes of Alfred Wallace went to the Amazon and Malaysia and killed thousands of species for profit. His prevailing attitude was "what a beautiful thing, let me kill it." Today he is venerated in the Natural History Museum, London. But why? For the most part it is simply because this mass species killer weirdly claimed to have the only known cognitive enhancing case of malarial fever in the history of scientific discovery to enable him to supposedly miraculously independently replicate a prior published theory (newly found to have been cited by the editor - Selby - of the journal that published his famous Sarawak paper on evolution by natural selection). But the theory he replicated belonged to Patrick Matthew.

Today, new data draws back this dusty Victorian curtain to further prove Darwin's friends and influences had also cited Matthew's 1831 bombshell breakthrough work pre Darwin's and Wallace's 1858/59 supposedly immaculate miraculous dual replications. Yet Matthew - the true originator of macroevolution by natural slection - was no species killer. Patrick Matthew wrote to Darwin in December 1862 "〈I am〉 not satisfied with my existence 〈 〉 to devour & trample upon my 〈fellow〉 creature. I cannot pluck a flower without regarding myself a destroyer."



Darwinophile nutjobs hate this kind of thing

Thursday, 3 May 2018

Dogma ruins everything

And other independently verifiable, expert peer reviewed, newly discovered, facts unearthed in the 19th century literature with BigData techniques (IDD) that fingers-in-their-ears and hands-over-their eyes Dawkinites and Darwinites blatantly refuse to accept

1. http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05

2. http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66



+

Greedy Alfred Wallace shot 17 apes for their skins!

Letter to an author (sent today) : 


Hi [Name removed]

I enjoyed your article on Wallace shooting apes in Sarawak. I investigated his odd claim (unique in the history of both malarial fever and scientific breakthrough discovery) to have independently conceived the theory of macroevolution by natural selection whilst recovering from malarial fever in Sarawak. It turns out that the naturalist Selby - chief editor of the journal that published his famous Sarawak paper - had prior read and cited the book containing what the world's leading experts (including both Darwin and Wallace) admit contains the complete first publication of the theory of macroevolution by natural selection.  You can read the independently verifiable facts (and more besides on Darwin) in these open access peer reviewed scholarly articles and my book:

3. The method used to make these new discoveries: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66

Wednesday, 2 May 2018

Disgusting Behaviour Facilitated by Wikipedia

+
Mike Sutton This dreadful behaviour (including a campaign of numerous malicious and malevolent emails sent to my employer and other academics (and more besides) including leading light members of the BSC) followed the BSC's expert peer reviewed publication of deeply disturbing new facts unearthed in the historic publication record on science fraud by plagiarism and lies - using a new method - (1) The new facts uncovered: http://britsoccrim.org/volume14/pbcc_2014_sutton.pdf and (2) the method used to discover it (also expert peer reviewed in a scholalry journal) http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66
+

⚡️ “Stepping up to the plate” +