Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Sunday, 6 March 2016

Conversation about facts with a Wikipedian

Last night, on Twitter, I had a conversation with a Wikipedian editor who was involved with Wikipedia training. I informed her of the fact Wikipedian editors are systematically deleting the significant fact that Charles Darwin blatantly lied in 1860 by denying that any naturalists had read Patrick Matthew's full prior-published theory of natural selection before he replicated it without citing Matthew.

Click: Here - On Twitter    to see the telling conversation.








2 comments:

  1. I think Wikipedian editors should take great care. The resource they are recklessly editing is causing the resource to be EXCLUDED from University recognition. Why does Wikipedia allow their editors - mostly female, as we've been told - to do this to such a potentially useful resource. We can't trust anything in Wikipedia after it has been edited in-house and there is a full history of such editing attached to each page. Take a look sometime and see what has newly been deleted and ask why?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suspect what has happened is that Wikipedia has, like so many other good ideas, been taken over by those who have a ne'erdowell predilection for "corporate gimpory". Unable to think for themselves, other than trotting out mindless corporate mantras and trying to follow an activity template to make decisions on matters in which they have no intrinsic understanding the result can only ever be stupidity. The problem is the general public (as always) fails to see what only a few ever do.

      Wikipedia is run by the type of imbecilic clowns who - for want of an ability to actually think and reason like productive adults - would perceive it to be be a good idea to install a child's slide in an adult working environment so as to stimulate creative progress. Result = imbecilic clown editors run an encyclopdia to be consumed by the vast majority of the population who are unable to tell (and don't actually care) that they have been punterized.

      Delete

Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.

On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Those who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.

Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realise Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.