Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

Darwin Scholar Makes Written Claims to the Scottish Press that My Independent Expert, Blind Peer Reviewed and Published in a Science Journal, Work is "So Silly" "Not New" and a "Conspiracy Theory"



















Michael Alexander of the Scottish Courier reports that Dr John van Wyhe is "rubbishing" my discoveries, reported in my latest peer reviewed science article, without any academic arguments to support why he wishes the Scottish public to believe the discoveries are "not new", why they are "so silly" and why they are a "conspiracy theory".

In his full statement to the press, where he effectively engages in fact denial regarding the new discovery of routes of knowledge contamination, Dr Van Wyhe wrote: 

      'Dr Sutton's allegations about a purported influence of Matthew on Darwin and Wallace are not new. This conspiracy theory is so silly and based on such forced and contorted imitations of historical method that no qualified historian could take it seriously.'

"Conspiracy theory" "Not new" "so silly" ? Really? 

So are new facts that reveal the existence of routes of possible knowledge contamination between Matthew, Darwin and Wallace really not new, silly & a conspiracy theory?

 Why would Dr van Wyhe deny the existence of 100 per cent proven, independently verifiable, newly discovered facts that completely overturn prior-knowledge beliefs in his field? Why write such a thing for public consumption about someone else's peer reviewed work? Is he "insanely jealous" or "wilfully ignorant"? What on Earth is the reason for such behaviour? Why deny the existence of 100 per cent proven newly discovered facts?

Does Dr John van Wyhe not release the serious social dangers of encouraging fact denial in history, science and in wider society?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.

On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Those who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.

Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realise Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.