Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Monday, 16 May 2016

Darwin Scholars and Creationists Might Just be Studying From the Same Pseudo-Scholar Manual : "The History of Science-Nazi's Fact Denial Guide"

CONCLUSION

Facts - historical facts,  newly discovered facts, 100 per cent proven facts, scientific journal peer reviewed facts have "little historical foundation" according to the creationist Michael Flannery.   No surprise there then. However, shockingly (yet academically interestingly) this is effectively the exact same pseudo-scholarly fact denial nonsense spouted to the Scottish press by the famous Darwin historian of science Dr John van Wyhe.

How will history treat van Wyhe's blatant fact denial? I wonder. See the facts of fact denial here




No comments:

Post a Comment

Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.

On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Those who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.

Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realise Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.