Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Tuesday, 17 October 2017

Gonzo Criminology is Fun

+

Monday, 16 October 2017

Amazon Review of Nullius

Sunday, 15 October 2017

Darwinities: Why, today, they have all "lost their yoyos"

Take away a precious yet childishly stupid thing or beloved silly belief from a nasty and simple-minded neerdowell person and they will engage in escalating nasty behaviour.




The #YoYoHypothesis
image
A nasty little man with a huge following of scared nasty little people with about as much imagination as a caravan site
image
(c) Andy Sutton (c) Mike Sutton. All Rights ReservedUsed only with express written permission
Second Edition of Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret
image
Wikipedia The Fake Encyclopedia - run by bitter little neerdowell failures

Today, Darwin Worshippers Have Lost their YoYos.

Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret    reveals the newspaper stories about some Darwin scholars and their unscholarly fact denial behaviour in response to the New Data proof of Darwin's science fraud by plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's prior publication of the unifying theory of biology.
Also, today, on the Wikipedia Patrick Matthew page   , Wikipedia neerdowell Darwin Cult trolls keep deleting the independently verifiable facts they cannot tolerate about Darwin's science fraud by lies and plagiarism and so they, in turn, keep lying that my peer reviewed criminology article on the New Data on that original discovery is not peer reviewed. See the proof they keep deleting that it is peer reviewed here    .(see p.1   ) Why? Because in the case in question, they have lost their silly Billy little Darwin YoYos. That such childish behaviour goes on unchecked is proof Wikipedia is a fake-facts encylopedia run for the benefit of neerdowell losers by losers.


Vae Victus!

Why in 2017 Darwinists have lost their YoYo's

Friday, 13 October 2017

On obsession as a necessary state of mind for paradigm change

+

Wikipedia is just brimming with lies and nonsense added by silly billy trolls and jealous neerdowell academic failures

Thursday, 12 October 2017

Multiple Coincidence?

Scottish Currency & Bias

On Digital Forensics

+

Wednesday, 11 October 2017

On Imagination based on evidence

Einstein told us that imagination, not mere learning of facts, is the true measure of intelligence. So what does that tell us about those propping up the intellectually corrupt Darwin Deification Industry?






Blyth is simply a red herring in the true story of Darwin's plagiarism

Tuesday, 10 October 2017

AN EDUCATIONAL WARNING TO CRIMINAL CYBER STALKERS AND THEIR CRIMINAL ASSOCIATES USING WEBSITES, SOCIAL MEDIA AND EMAIL TO ABUSE

+ + + + +

Lawyer Ian Hardie donates three priceless letters to the National Museum of Scotland

This will be a "shake-up" shockwave through the scientific establishment

Monday, 9 October 2017

Grass Roots Movement for Matthew

Paradigm Change Cycle

+ + +

Saturday, 7 October 2017

Truth is Most Circumstance Suited to Survive in the End: Vae Victus!

Last weekend I attended the Carse of Gowrie Sustainability Group's Patrick Matthew Festival Weekend   , which was funded by the UK National Lottery Heritage Fund.
Matthew is the true originator of the theory of macroevolution by natural selection. He is proven to have been cheated out of his full first and foremost priority for prior publishing it by Charles Darwin, his associates, and the scientific establishment. See Sutton 2016    for the detailed 600 page account and the new abridged and updated paperback (vol 1 of a total of 3 forthcoming volumes) See: vol 1, now out in paperback Sutton 2017   .
Many of Matthew's descendants attended the event last week   . They came from around the World.

image

At the first Patrick Matthew Celebration Weekend Festival September/October 2017
Boat tours were given on the river Tay    to see the remnants of the rail bridge disaster and hear all the gruesome details about Matthew's accurate predictions that it would happen.
Matthew's once long lost grave site has been discovered and marked with an information board and QR code in the graveyard. A suitable headstone for the real originator of the unifying theory of biology will be erected soon.


I gave a lecture, based on my book, on the timeline of independently verifiable facts from the 19th century publication record that prove Darwin told multiple deliberately self-serving ies about the readership and content of Matthew's (1831) book On Naval Timber and Arboriculture. The facts I revealed prove also that Darwin's associate and correspondent John Lindley committed a crafty theft    of Matthew's right to be attributed in the 19th century with being first to introduce and propagate giant redwood trees in the UK.
image
(c) Andy Sutton (c) Mike Sutton. All Rights ReservedUsed only with express written permission
Second Edition of Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret
The Patrick Matthew Trail has been been signposted and marked with QR codes.
image
The Patrick Matthew Trail
Priceless original letters from Charles Darwin to Patrick Matthew have been donated by Ian Hardie to the National Museum of Scotland, Letters from Matthew to Lord Kinnaird are on display in Bell Library Perth. The next step is to build the Patrick Matthew Museum In the Carse of Gowrie. And plans for that are now afoot.


Moves are being made as I write to make a major television documentary on the facts of Darwin's great science fraud by plagiary, the role of the scientific establishment and its toadying acolytes and dunderheaded de facto servants, in suppressing the facts.

Influential Scots now aim to have Matthew's image on Scottish currency.
The newly discovered and independently verifiable facts in the story of Matthew. Darwin and Wallace re-write the history of discovery of macro evolution by natural selection.
This is a major story in the field of science, history, politics, science fraud and unscholarly cowardly fear and loathing of unwelcome verifiable facts by those with the misplaced power to censor and suppress them. The long dead culprits and their modern contemporaries are being, and will be, judged and shamed by their own behaviour, the facts - and how society responds to them - accordingly. Their fully evidenced shameful activities will be headlines in national newspapers in the near future.
All facts are the friends of truth and science, whether or not some people don't understand them, dislike and fear them and their immediate implications. Being the most fit to survive, the truth has a habit of establishing a power of occupancy in the end.

Hedge your bets on the side of verifiable veracity, not mere wishful thinking belief

After my lecture at the Patrick Matthew celebratory weekend I dined to the sound of bagpipes and beautiful singing with the the Scottish lawyer, Ian Hardie, and a major hedge fund manager from the City (London). The investment fund manager told me that the only reason some university academics are currently engaging in inappropriate behavior to seek to suppress the newly discovered facts is because they have never before been faced with facts that demolish their beliefs. He said that were he to act as they are doing, his world famous hedge fund would collapse inside 24 hours. He explained how hedge fund managers must keep a completely open mind - and to check and weigh the evidence -during every second of their working day. There is a great lesson for all dunderheads to at least  try to think about in that analogous example. Adapt or die!

Albert Einstein wrote that imagination, not learning, was the mark of intelligence. Risk averse fact deniers and other unthinking brute censors should ask themsleves how their behaviour would look as a Daily Mail headline.
Vae Victus!
image
The Carse of Gowrie Sustainability GroupAttribution
The Patrick Matthew Trail
+
+
+

+
+

Friday, 6 October 2017

What would the Sutton discovery story look like as a headline in the Daily Mail?

+ +

Thursday, 5 October 2017

This Giant Redwood has only just Been DNA Matched with Parent tree in California

Wednesday, 4 October 2017

Science is a way to not get fooled

Did Darwin do it? The unwelcome facts prove he did

+ +

Tuesday, 3 October 2017

Tay Rail Bridge Disaster Boat Tour

I went on this trip. It was excellent. I expect it may well become a regular attraction and part of the growing Patrick Matthew tourism industry in Scotland:

Boat tours will tell the tale behind the Tay Bridge tragedy: Here



Patrick Matthew: 19th Century Scottish Nobleman

Most interestingly, a review of Matthew’s book ‘Emigration Fields’ in the Athenaeum (1839, p. 477) – the journal of the Gentleman’s club frequented at that time by Darwin and Lyell – warned of the great risk of land investment in the new world and warned against the dangers of Matthew’s popularity and his membership of the nobility acting as an allurement to risky speculation: 
‘The authorship of this project and that of the South-Australian Colonization, belong we believe, to the same individual. Government will, we suppose, be thus forced into a recognition of the scheme of colonization, which it is unable to prevent; but we hope that the interest which attaches to the project as a political experiment will not conspire with the rank and popularity of the nobleman who patronizes it, to divert attention from the pecuniary speculation which may possibly lurk beneath. We cannot imagine any schemes more to be deprecated than bubble colonies.’
From the 600 page extended edition E-book (Kindle edition) of Nullius in Verba


See https://deriv.nls.uk/dcn23/8567/85673692.23.pdf



Monday, 2 October 2017

Latest News on Patrick Matthew


Perthshire scientific pioneer remembered: Here



+

Matthew owned two sloops

Picture courtesy of Howard Minnick from a photograph of the Tay Landscape Partnership's interpretation board about Patrick Matthew having two of his own ships. 

Text from my 2014 extended 600 page 1st edition Kindle e-book on Matthew (Nullius in Verba Darwin's greatest secret"At least according to the anonymous Edinburgh Literary Journal Review (1831) of NTA, Matthew owned two sea-going vessels, which traded from Perth and Dundee with the Baltic."




Sunday, 1 October 2017

Thursday, 28 September 2017

Wednesday, 27 September 2017

Robot University:The affordable option

Nullius Book Reviews

+

Tuesday, 26 September 2017

Saturday, 23 September 2017

Science v Pseudoscience



Friday, 22 September 2017

On Academic Freedom



+ +

Thursday, 14 September 2017

The £10 Darwins

+


Tuesday, 12 September 2017

GCSE Darwin Monkey Business

Darwin Catfight in the Evening Standard

Sunday, 10 September 2017

The Patrick Matthew Weekend

+

After the Age of Enlightenment, facts are supposed be judged on their merits, not source of publication

+
+

Thursday, 7 September 2017

Even more evidence of foul language Darwinite abuse of those they disagree with

Look, at least from what I have read of his own accounts about it, A.N. Wilson has indeed written a fair degree of nonsense and he does appear to confuse natural selection with the ancient development hypothesis, but that does not excuse publishing foul penned abuse such as this.  No wonder Amazon deleted it.

+

Saturday, 2 September 2017

More hard data from social media of Darwinists publishing foul abuse when faced by unwelcome verifiable facts that disconfirm their unevidenced mere comfort-beliefs

+ + + + + + + + + +

Wednesday, 30 August 2017

Charles Darwin's Tangled Bank Job: Just More Evidence of his Science Fraud by Plagiary


A recent review in the Guardian newspaper    of the historian A.N. Wilson’s book on Charles Darwin points out – quite correctly - many of Wilson’s mistakes and his failure to understand what the process of natural selection is. The book review is written by Victorian history expert Kathryn Hughes. However, waxing lyrical in credulous regurgitation of the romance and lies about Darwin’s supposed good nature and original genius, she uses the cliched example of Darwin’s supposed observations of a tangled bank in nature as supposed evidence of his originality. Hughes writes:
His most famous motif, the one that everyone remembers because it leaps off the page with such unforced joy, is that of the tangled bank. Based on his daily observations of a stretch of land near his home, Darwin describes a buzzing ecosystem that is home to plants, birds and insects “all dependent on each other”. Here, he implies, is a microcosm for how we too might imagine our lives.’
But, once again, this is just another example of Darwin replicating Patrick Matthew’s (1831) original theory and its supporting examples, explanatory analogies of difference and terminology.
I could add a wealth of examples of how many of Matthew's prior-published ideas, original terminology, and confirmatory evidence were replicated by Darwin. Those examples are provided in my book "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret   " but - given the tangled bank example used in the Guardian review one should look at what the statistical geneticist Dr Mike Weale tells us about Professor Donald Forsdyke's observations of Darwin's tangled bank text and its similarities to an evidentiary example provided by Patrick Matthew almost three decades earlier. The text below is taken from the comments section of Weal's website "The Patrick Matthew Project" and are addressed to me: 
"Mike, were you aware of the following interesting similarity between a famous passage of Darwin’s, and something that Matthew wrote in NTA? I thank Donald Forsdyke for pointing out the Matthew quote (see the end of his last video in his educational video series (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL59A9C65FB0DCED9E   ).
The Darwin quote, from the last paragraph of “On the Origin of Species”, is: “It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us.”
The Matthew quote, from pp.229-30 of NTA, is: “Look at the broken mound, with its old picturesque trees and tangled bushes; there is the ancient root where the throstle had its nestlings, which are now at large on the leafy boughs, and are tuning their yet unformed notes to melody. Now every twig has raised its new column of foliage to the sun; and branch, and root, and stone, embellished all over in the richest variety of cryptogamic beauty, swarm of insect life.”
The scene is used differently (to contemplate Nature’s laws by Darwin, to contrast beautiful Nature with boring manicured parks by Matthew), but the similarity of the picture is striking."
NOTE: NTA is an acronym for Matthew's book 'On Naval Timber and Arboriculture.'

The most telling question is: When will historians face the concrete fully evidenced truth and choose it over the romance and lies about Charles Darwin, which they have been hoodwinked to believe in?The most telling question is this: ‘Just how many supposed multiple coincidences of this kind are required in the story of Matthew and Darwin to convince scientists and historians that Darwin more likely than not plagiarised Matthew’s prior published discovery of evolution by natural selection, and in doing so committed the world’s greatest science fraud?’ My book is jam packed with them. Jam-packed with independently verifiable evidence of Darwin’s lies and Matthew’s influence on other naturalists known to Darwin and Wallace and his influence on their greatest influencers and their influencer’s influencers before either Darwin or Wallace penned a word on the topic of evolution. How can this be so? Because it is newly discovered those naturalists actually cited Matthew’s book and original ideas long before Darwin and Wallace replicated them. And Matthew’s work was cited by naturalists long before Darwin excused his and Wallace’s failure to cite Matthew by lying that no naturalist had read Matthew’s work. It was a lie because Matthew had twice prior informed Darwin that the exact opposite was true.

Darwin, the patron saint of atheists in fact kept the notion of a supernatural being in several editions of his Origin of Species. Read the whole context of his "tangled bank" job from that book and you will see this fact:


Now, by way of contrast, see how Matthew (1831) , the originator of the theory Darwin and Wallace stole, had the courage - years earlier - to commit heresy by mocking such an unscientific superstitious notion:


As I fully reveal in my book Nullius  - It was for such reason, as Matthew explained to Darwin in the pages of the Gardeners' Chronicle of 1860, that his work was banned by libraries and renowned university academics feared to repeat his ideas for fear of pillory punishment. But you won't read those facts in any ignorant Darwin bashing book penned by a born again creationist, nor in any penned by a credulous and biased, cherry-picking, Darwin worshipper.


1000 hits inside 24 hours on Darwin's plagiaism

Guardian Review of A.N. Wilson's book: The Grassy Bank Job

Today I left the following comments on the Guardian Newspaper website regarding a book review of A.N. Wilson's book on Darwin.

CLICK HERE to read the Guardian article and comments on it 



01
Typo in my comment on the "grassy bank job" below. I mean in the opening sentence - of course - replicated by Darwin.



  • 01
    I could add a wealth of examples of how many of Matthew's prior-published ideas, original terminology, and confirmatory evidence were replicated by Matthew from my book "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret" but - given the grassy bank example used in the Guardian review above look at what the statistical geneticist Dr Mike Weale tells us about Professor Donald Forsdyke observations of Darwin's grassy bank text and its similarities to an evidentiary example provided by Patrick Matthew almost three decades earlier. In the text below (taken from the comments section of Weal's website "The Patrick Matthew Project" is addressed to me - Professor Forsdyke very kindly read my book and offered comments on it prior to its publication - NTA is an acronym for Matthew's 1831 book On Naval Timber and Arboriculture :
    "Mike, were you aware of the following interesting similarity between a famous passage of Darwin’s, and something that Matthew wrote in NTA? I thank Donald Forsdyke for pointing out the Matthew quote (see the end of his last video in his educational video series (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL59A9C65FB0DCED9E).
    The Darwin quote, from the last paragraph of “On the Origin of Species”, is: “It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us.”
    The Matthew quote, from pp.229-30 of NTA, is: “Look at the broken mound, with its old picturesque trees and tangled bushes; there is the ancient root where the throstle had its nestlings, which are now at large on the leafy boughs, and are tuning their yet unformed notes to melody. Now every twig has raised its new column of foliage to the sun; and branch, and root, and stone, embellished all over in the richest variety of cryptogamic beauty, swarm of insect life.”
    The scene is used differently (to contemplate Nature’s laws by Darwin, to contrast beautiful Nature with boring manicured parks by Matthew), but the similarity of the picture is striking."


  • 01
    It is clear to anyone with an understanding of it that A.N. Wilson confuses the simple ancient (linear) development hypothesis of evolution with far more complex theory of macroevolution by natural selection. Is it because he is a born-again creationist that Wilson makes no mention of Patrick Matthew, the true originator of the theory? Unlike Darwin, Patrick Matthew mocked "God" in his (1831) book, which contains the entire complex theory. Darwin, Wallace, Darwin's wife and the world’s leading evolutionary biologists (e.g. de Beer, Mayr and Dawkins) all wrote that Matthew was first into print in 1831 with the entire thing. Darwin wrote lies that none read Matthew's origination. Darwin wrote those lies after Matthew informed him that the opposite was true. The suppression of Matthew's first and foremost legacy is founded on credulous belief in those sly lies. If you want the independently verifiable facts about Darwin's lies and plagiarism (as unpalatable to creationists as to those in the cult of Darwin worship) simply Google "On Knowledge Contamination" to read my peer reviewed science article on the topic.
+