More fact denial behaviour in social media captured for the historical record

.@Lorienen @interUNFAO @DISSENTOFMAN Read facts. Perhaps you might then abandon the Darwin worship fact-denal cult: https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m pic.twitter.com/BLuO9TRfSX

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 19, 2016

++

The words you are reading here are 100% proven to exist. Look 100 times - count the number of times they disappear.: https://t.co/WOiVuLvCho

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 20, 2016

Kindle Notes on Nullius

Having your book on Kindle & Amazon is a great way to share the findings & ideas in it so others cans see for free: https://t.co/7kYjx0QF2D pic.twitter.com/V4GKTQVZYD

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 19, 2016

RankBrain and the IDD Mehod

@guardiannews About time. Google' AI Rank Brain is possibly out of control: https://t.co/jt4VaEwOUz pic.twitter.com/NP0jMsHEMk

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 18, 2016

++

Google's racist RankBrain now likely to be regulated by the UK government

1. https://t.co/nG7VeWlhyD

2. https://t.co/o32zkwE6JL pic.twitter.com/shlpCFXmbX

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 18, 2016

Blame it on the Pseudo Skeptical Zombie Sheep Herders

My resolution for 2017? I'm simply blaming everything that is bad on the credulous & incurious zombie horde & their pseudo-skeptical leaders pic.twitter.com/nH2Eo1e1Oa

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 18, 2016

The Problematic Darwinian Defence of Multiple Coincidence

When it comes to the problem of a supposedly independent replication of a prior published discovery, science cannot tell us how many coincidences sum to a number that would  render the replicator's defence of multiple coincidence improbable. Moreover, how many routes for knowledge contamination sum to a number that makes it more likely than not that at least one was taken? HERE   

Attention @sherlockmichael @DISSENTOFMAN @TakeThatDarwin @Lorienen @Jackthelad1947 @SamHarrisOrg https://t.co/JEaSsXeRwy

— HUMANIST (@interUNFAO) December 18, 2016

++

Calculating improbable multiple coincidence in independent discovery replication. Science problem requires solution https://t.co/tjS3g9kZ25 pic.twitter.com/xuwGIgk5N2

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 18, 2016

++
Nullius in Verba': On sale HERE.    The ideal present for the genuine scientist, skeptic, historian or sociologist.

Darwin is not the Messiah He was a very naughty boy.

He is not the Messiah! He's a very naughty plagiarist! :

1. https://t.co/P7Q3T3Nx5C

2. https://t.co/JIdFnrcCVZ pic.twitter.com/R9WAS2HO62

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 17, 2016

++

https://t.co/zKERi4J1M0 pic.twitter.com/7BWzD0Hu7t

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 17, 2016

How Many Coincidences Sum to the Point Where They Render the Defence of Multiple Coincidence Totally Implausible?

.@interUNFAO Presenting new & independently verifiable evidence that leads to ask just how many coincidences sum to a likelihood they never? pic.twitter.com/uAjKyoIwN5

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 17, 2016

++

Read the Newly Discovered Data

The Zombie Horde

Don't be one of the dogma parroting zombie horde. Learn principles of 'Nullius in Verba'. Practice to perfection.https://t.co/Wdm2URFkpv pic.twitter.com/vR5AgSQ5zK

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 16, 2016

Desperate Darwinists

.@TWRaymen And writing fake book reviews when not having read your book then caught out by your publisher confronted & outed on social media pic.twitter.com/5ZeiWZagcW

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 15, 2016

As Opposed to Mere Dogma

As Opposed to Dogma & Pseudoscholalry Trusims, Good Explanations are Capable of Refutation with Disconforming Data https://t.co/fM8vlrHPw7

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 14, 2016

Plagiarism - You Either Love it or Hate It

You either love it if you are a plagiarist - or hate it.

1, https://t.co/jj27KPguZU

2. https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI

3. https://t.co/DotiWqaMkb pic.twitter.com/uKTpnUxvB7

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) December 13, 2016

Good Explanations are Capable of Easy Refutation with Hard Facts

.@ThinkAtheist Good explanations are capable of easy refutation. If ever we find a dinosaur above a human skeleton that disproves evolution. pic.twitter.com/wgAd7rMeZ3

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 11, 2016

The "No Naturalists  Read It" Premesis Underpinning the Darwinite Paradigm of Darwin's and Wallace's Independent Conceptions of Matthew's Prior Publshed Theory is 100 per cent Disconfirmed with Indpendently Verifiable Hard Evidence: Here 

Fact Denying Darwinians Face Intellectual Extinction

In the Democratic World we All have this Responsibility to Tackle Establishment Fact Denial: https://t.co/MXoXcakQ8u pic.twitter.com/d12PRE9tnk

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 16, 2016

Find out how Big Data analysis proved biologists think 25 = 0

Find out how I GOT 'EM! in first 3 #FREE chapters. Darwin & Wallace plagiarizing fraudstershttp://t.co/aE7UFhT8oZ … pic.twitter.com/sMrPchnOoc

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 27, 2015

Proof of Concept

Proof of concept as 8000+ brains now contaminated with the knowledge of Darwin's plagiarism and science fraud lies: https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m pic.twitter.com/D03Knn3feQ

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 9, 2016

++

Two peer reviewed articles prove we celebrate a glory thieving liar on the £10 note
1. https://t.co/yMLRSHW8Vc
2. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/5xkPjbmQiQ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 11, 2016

Can Biologists count to four?

Quantitative research of the simplest kind 100% disproves claims of the scientific establishment. 1+1+1+1 = 4 versus = Zero. pic.twitter.com/bTG9zZ3PXf

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 5, 2016

Are we attracted to belief in improbable independent conceptions and then to worship the claimants?

My Gift to Publier - The town in France forced to take down its Virgin Mary statue, because it is secular and in a public place Here 

Public Domain

Celebration in Public Places of Non-Secular Scientific Beliefs in Improbable Miracles is Probably OK in France

Christians believe that, whilst surrounded by men who were fertile to some degree, St Mary had a virgin conception of Jesus of Nazareth by way of a supernatural deity.

Members of the scientific establishment believe Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace each independently conceived Patrick Matthew's prior published theory of macroevolution by natural slection whilst surrounded and influenced by friends, associates, and - in Wallace's case his editor - whose brains were fertile with Matthew's original breakthrough, because years earlier they cited the book containing it!

Perhaps there is something in the human psyche causing a compulsion to believe in improbable claims to independent conceptions and then worship the claimant?

More context: Here.   

Wallace could well have lied: In light of the new evidence

Available on Amazon: https://t.co/jj27KPguZU pic.twitter.com/aXtWuTMRKA

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) December 4, 2016

The Blessed Virgin Darwin

.@DrIreneZempi They can have the Virgin Darwin Image then. I think that will be OK because based on scientists with faith in dual miracle. pic.twitter.com/GddeY6GFg0

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 4, 2016

Darwin Lied

https://t.co/6JQXBT0hko pic.twitter.com/qzxSF0IKTz

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 3, 2016